The transformation of the discourse of the non-commitment movement from the beginning until now

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Chalos Branch Azad University

2 Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Mazandaran University, Babolsar, Iran

10.22080/jpir.2024.26998.1372

Abstract

With the passage of more than half a century since the establishment of the Non-Aligned Movement, this movement has always undergone significant changes in terms of discourse. However, the Non-Aligned Movement in its dominant discourse from the beginning of its establishment until the end of the Cold War has been active and balancing negative and positive neutrality. In a way, this dominant discourse was due to the presence of the authoritarian leaders of the founding governments of the Non-Alignment Movement who always stood by their principles and ideals, but after the Cold War until the Sharm El-Sheikh Summit, this movement has assumed a passive state and more It seeks a positive balance and this discourse evolution could be due to the unipolar atmosphere of the world after the Cold War And from the meeting of Sharm Ashikh to Tehran, the movement has been re-identified in a way and has almost returned to its active state, and one of the reasons for this can be considered the powerful presence of Iran in the movement, because in these few years, Iran has been a kind of spokesperson for the southern member countries of the movement. It is against the rich countries of the north.
However, in this research, the author has tried to discuss the meaning of discourse from the perspective of the structuralists whose predecessors are considered bisaurus, as well as the discursive evolution of the non-alignment movement in three periods of time in a descriptive-analytical manner.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume 6, Issue 12
January 2023
Pages 39-59

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics