The evolutions of international system after the cold war and the new variations of force balanc

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

University of Gilan

Abstract

Realism paradigm for assuming power phobia international system, this  theory has supposed security-seeking and continuance guarantee by self-assistance as the mast important characteristic of international system, in turn, this makes the reproduction of the endless cycle of security puzzle. Realists know the only way for domination on security puzzle in putting power against power, labeled the so called force balance or power balance. But after the destruction of the past soviet union and dying two-polar system and remaining the united states in international system as the only super-power. The prediction of the establishment of a balance from the realists was met with problems. In this article, the goal is that we express that the realist thinker not only have been coordinated against these criticisms but also have paid in different way, to the explanation of this evolution, after the distraction of two-power system which this bold effort, in addition to responding to critics is considered an important factor in the evolution and resurrection of the theory of force balance and the so-called updating this research method applied in this study is analytic at descriptive.

Keywords


  1. لیتل، ریچارد (1389)، تحول در نظریه ­های موازنه قوا، ترجمه غلامعلی چگنی­زاده، تهران، موسسه ابرار معاصر تهران.
  2. هنسن، برث. تافت پتر. ویول آندره (1390)، راهبردهای امنیتی و نظم جهانی آمریکایی، «قدرت از دست رفته»، ترجمه سید امیر نیاکویی و احمد جانسیز، گیلان: انتشارات دانشگاه گیلان.
  3. چگنی­زاده، غلامعلی (1392)، «موازنه قوا و روابط راهبری چین با ایالات متحده آمریکا»، فصلنامه روابط خارجی، سال پنجم، شماره چهارم، زمستان.
  4. شیهان، مایکل (1388)، امنیت بین الملل، ترجمه سید جلال دهقانی فیروزآبادی، تهران: انتشارات پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
  5. ایکنبری، جی، جان (1382)، تنها ابر قدرت، هژمونی آمریکا در قرن 21، ترجمه عظیم فضلی پور، تهران: انتشارات موسسه فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین المللی ابرار معاصر تهران.
  6. والفورث، ویلیام سی، اسمیت دراستیو، هرفیلد ایمیلیا، دان تیم (1391)، سیاست خارجی، نظریه، بازیگران و موارد مطالعاتی، ترجمه امیرمحمد حاجی یوسفی، محسن محمودی و ایوب کریمی، تهران، انتشارات سمت، جلد اول.

 

  1. Hansen, Birth, Anders Wivel and peter T (2009), security strategies and: Lost power, contemporary security studies, New York Rutledge.
  2. Hansen, Birth (2000), Unipolarity and the Middle East, Richmond: Curzon.
  3. Schweller, Randall, L­ (1998), Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of world conquest, New York: Columbia University Press.
  4. Schweller, Randall,L (1993), ‟ Tripolarity and the second world war”, International studies quarterly, 37.
  5. Schweller, Randall,L (2006), Unanswered threats: political constraints on the Balance of power, Princeton, NJ:Princenton University Press.
  6. Waltz, K.N (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House.
  7. Pape, Robert. Anthony (2005), “soft Balancing against the United states” International Security.30, No, (1).
  8. Paul, T.V (2004), “Introduction: the enduring axioms of Balance of power theory and their contemporary relevance”, in; T.V.Paul,J.I. Writz and M. Fortmann (eds) Balance of power: Theory and practice in the 21 st century, Stanford: Stanford university press.
  9. Mouritzen. H. and wivel, A. (eds), (2005). The Geopolitics of Euro – Atlantic Integration, Landon: Rutledge.
  10. Mearsheimer, J (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, Norton: New York.
  11. Walt, Stephen M (2005), Taming American power: the Global Response to U.S. Primacy. New York; London: www. Norton.
  12. Walt, Stephen M (2009), “Alliance in a unipolar world”, World Politics, 61,(1).  
  13. G, John, Ikenberry (1999), “Liberal Hegemony and the future of American Post Power Order”: T.V.Paul and John A. Hall. International order and the future of  world Politics, Cambridge, university Press.
  14. Pillar, Pual R (2004), Terrorism and u.s foreign Policy, Washington DC: Bookings, Institute press.
  15. Walt, Stephen M (2000), The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca N.Y: Cornell university press.