A Comparative Study about Function of United Nations Security Council on the I.R. of Iran and North Korea's Nuclear File

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 university of esfahan

2 university of alame tabatabai

Abstract


Security Council of U.N. has a duty to keep international peace and security. Islamic Republic of Iran and North Koreas nuclear crisis are the crisis that has led to International Community to think about them. The goal of this study is to find out how is the performance of the Security Council regarding Iran and North Koreas nuclear program. The assumption is that the performance of the Security Council regarding the nuclear case of these two countries was discriminatory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of resolution by the Security Council regarding the nuclear program of Iran and North Korea. Findings show that both countries are subject of economic sanctions, political pressure and military threats. While North Korea has declared explicitly that, they want atomic energy for military use, Iran has repeatedly stated that its attention of nuclear energy is for peaceful purposes and is committed to NPT.

Keywords

References

1. چیلکوت، رونالد (1378)، نظریه‌های سیاست مقایسه‌ای، ترجمه وحید بزرگی و علیرضا طیب، چاپ دوم، تهران: موسسه خدماتی فرهنگی رسا. 2. طلوعی، محمود (1385)، فرهنگ جامع سیاسی، تهران: چاپ گلرنگ یکتا.چاپ سوم. 3. عالم، عبد الرحمان (1388)، بنیاد های علم سیاست، چاپ بیستم، تهران: نشر نی. 4. غرایاق زندی، داوود (1387)، ایران و مسئله هسته‌ای، تهران:‌ پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی غیرآبادی. 5. غریب‌آبادی، کاظم (1387)، نهضت ملی هسته‌ای، تهران: انتشارات وزارت امور خارجه، چاپ اول. 6. قوام، سید عبد العلی (1391)، سیاست‌های مقایسه‌ای، چاپ سیزدهم، تهران: انتشارات سمت. 7. ممتاز، جمشید (1377)، حقوق بین الملل سلاح‌های کشتار جمعی، ترجمه امیر حسین رنجبریان، تهران: نشر دادگستر. 8. میدانی، سید حسین سادات (1385)، « شورای امنیت و پرونده هسته‌ای ایران :تقابل حاکمیت حقوق بین الملل با صلح بین المللی»، فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، سال بیستم، شماره1، بهار.
1. Ambrid N.Shaw(1997),international law,uk: ambridge-niversity press, Lijphart, Arend (1971). ‟Comparative politics and the comparative method”. 2. American Political Science Review 65 (3): doi:10.2307/1955513. JSTOR 1955513. 3. http://www.internationallaw.ir. 4. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org. 5. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents. 6. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/dprk-north-korea. 7. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/search. 8. http://www.un.org/en/sc/documents/resolutions. 9. http://www.un.org/en/sc/documents/resolutions. 10. http://www.world-nuclear.org. 11. http://www1.jamejamonline.ir. 12. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/dprk/iaea-resolutions. 13. martti koskenniemi(1995),‟the police in the temple:order,justice the un;a. dialectical view,”5 european journal of international law,vol.5. 14. Stefan Talmon, ‟The Statements by the President of the Security Council”, Chinese Journal of International Law, 2003, no. 2, p.
Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume 1, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
1396
Spring and Summer
July 2017
Pages 53-77

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics