Iran's Science Diplomacy in the South Caucasus Case Study: The Republic of Azerbaijan

1. Alili, Ahmad (2015),‟Azerbaijan and Iran after the Sanctions: The Pathways of Advanced Engagement and Confrontation”, http://www.cesd.az/new/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Azerbaijan-and-Iran-after-the-Sanctions.pdf (Accessed on: Aug. 2016). 2. Caucasus University Association, http://www.kunib.com/ (Accessed on: Aug. 2016). 3. Committee on Global Science Policy and Science Diplomacy; National Research Council (2011), ‟U.S. and International Perspectives on Global Science Policy and Science Diplomacy: Report of a Workshop”, available at:< http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13300> 4. Demir, Cennet Engine & Co-authors (2000) ‟The role of Turkish schools in the educational system and socialtransformation of Central Asian countries: the case of Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan”, Central Asian Survey,Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 141-155. 5. Embassy of the United States in Baku (2016), (Accessed on: Oct. 2016). 6. European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (2013), ‟Azerbaijan: Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013”, 7. Fedoroff, Nina V (Jan. 2009), ‟Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century”, Cell, No. 136, pp. 9-11, available at:< http://ac.els-cdn.com/S009286740801636X/1-s2.0-S009286740801636X-main.pdf?_tid=7c779268-4a26-11e5-877a-00000aacb35 f&acdnat=1440396666_eeba8e016def0ae68fd72995865769c2> 8. Flink, Tim & Ulrich Schreiterer (2010), ‟Science Diplomacy at the Intersection of S & T Policies and Foreign Affairs: toward a typology of national approaches”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 665-677. 9. Fominykh, Alexey (2010), ‟Projecting Soft Power: American and Russian Public Diplomacy in Post-Soviet Central Asia”, Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 66-77. 10. Guseinov, Rashad (2008), ‟The Main Development Trends in Bilateral Relations between Azerbaijan and Israel”, The Caucasus and Globalization, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 41-48. 11. Jackson, Alexander (2011), ‟The Limits of Good Intentions:The Caucasus as a Test Case for Turkish Foreign Policy”, Turkish Policy Quarterly,Vol.9,No.4. 12. Koolaee, Elaheh & Mohammad Hossein Hafezian (2010), ‟The Islamic Republic of Iran and the South Caucasus Republics”, Iranian Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 391-409. 13. Institute for War and Peace Reporting (9/2/2016), ‟Azerbaijan Continues Anti-Gulen Campaign”, 14. Ismailzadeh, Fariz (Feb. 2016), ‟A Breakthrough in Iran-Azerbaijan Relations”, http://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13330-a-breakthrough-in-iran-azerbaijan-relations?.html (Accessed on: Aug. 2016). 15. Marquardt, Kyle L. (2011), ‟Framing Language Policy in Post-Soviet Azerbaijan: Political Symbolism and Interethnic Harmony”, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 181-196. 16. Melissen, Jan (2005),‌ The New Public Diplomacy, New York: PalgraveMacmillan. 17. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (2016), ‟ CIS Branches of the Russian Higher Educational Institutions”, < http://en.russia.edu.ru/zvuz/1067/> (Accessed on: Oct. 2016). 18. Motika, Raoul (2001), ‟Islam in Post-Soviet Azerbaijan”, Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions, Vol. 46, No. 115, pp. 111-124. 19. Nye, Joseph S. (2004), Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs. 20. Peter Berg, Lutz (2010), ‟Science Diplomacy Networks”, Politorbis, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 70-74. 21. The Royal Society (Jan. 2010), ‟The New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy”, available at: < https://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2010/new-frontiers-science-diplomacy>. 22. Tokluoglu, Ceylan (2005)‟Definitions of National Identity, Nationalism and Ethnicity in Post-Soviet Azerbaijan in the 1990s”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 722-758. 23. Turekian, Vaughan C. & Norman P. Neureiter (March 2012), ‟Science and Diplomacy: The Past as Prologue,” Science & Diplomacy, Vol. 1, No. 1, available at: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2012/science-and-diplomacy 24. Turekian, Vaughan C. (2012),‟Building a National Science Diplomacy System”, Science & Diplomacy, Vol. 1, No. 4, < http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2014/educating-for-science-diplomacy> 25. Turekian, Vaughan C. & Tom C. Wang (March 2014), ‟Educating for Science Diplomacy” Science & Diplomacy, Vol. 3, No. 1, available at: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2012/science-and-diplomacy 26. Study in Turkey (2016), ‟International Students Mobility Statistics”, < http://www.studyinturkey.com/content/sub/mobility_statistic.aspx (Accessed on: Sep. 2016). 27. Emil Souleimanov & Maya Ehrmann (2013), ‟The Rise of Militant Salafism in Azerbaijan and its Regional Implications”, Middle East Policy Council, < http://www.mepc.org/journal/middle-east-policy-archives/rise-militant-salafism-azerbaijan-and-its-regional-implications> 28. Souleimanov, Emil, Maya Ehrmann & Huseyn Aliyev (2014), ‟Focused on Iran? Exploring the rationale behind the strategic relationship between Azerbaijan and Israel”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 14, No.4, pp. 471-488. 29. Tafuro, Eleonora (2014), ‟Fatal Attraction? Russia’s Soft Power in its Neighbourhood-Analysis”, Eurasia Review, http://www.eurasiareview.com/29052014-fatal-attraction-russias-soft-power-neighbourhood-analysis/ 30. Valiyev, Anar (July 2005), ‟The Rise of Salafi Islam in Azerbaijan”, The Jamestown Foundation, < https://jamestown.org/program/the-rise-of-salafi-islam-in-azerbaijan/> 31. Wagner, Caroline S. & Co-Authors (2001), ‟Science and Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity in Developing Countries”, Rand, Science and Technology Policy Institute. 32. Yanik, Lerna K. (2004),‟The Politics of Educational Exchange:Turkish Education in Eurasia”, Europe-Asia Studies,Vol. 56, No. 2. 33. Zewail, Ahmed H. (2010),‟Science in Diplomacy”, Cell, Vol. 141, No. 2, pp. 204-207.